Get Free Ebook The Evil 100, by Martin Gilman Wolcott
How can? Do you believe that you do not need sufficient time to opt for purchasing e-book The Evil 100, By Martin Gilman Wolcott Never mind! Just rest on your seat. Open your device or computer system and also be online. You can open up or check out the web link download that we gave to obtain this The Evil 100, By Martin Gilman Wolcott By in this manner, you can get the online e-book The Evil 100, By Martin Gilman Wolcott Reading guide The Evil 100, By Martin Gilman Wolcott by online can be really done quickly by conserving it in your computer system as well as device. So, you could continue whenever you have leisure time.
The Evil 100, by Martin Gilman Wolcott
Get Free Ebook The Evil 100, by Martin Gilman Wolcott
The Evil 100, By Martin Gilman Wolcott When composing can change your life, when creating can improve you by providing much money, why don't you try it? Are you still very confused of where understanding? Do you still have no idea with exactly what you are going to write? Currently, you will need reading The Evil 100, By Martin Gilman Wolcott A great writer is a great reader at the same time. You can specify just how you write depending upon just what books to read. This The Evil 100, By Martin Gilman Wolcott could help you to resolve the issue. It can be one of the right resources to develop your creating skill.
Reviewing practice will certainly constantly lead people not to satisfied reading The Evil 100, By Martin Gilman Wolcott, a book, 10 publication, hundreds e-books, and much more. One that will make them really feel pleased is finishing reading this e-book The Evil 100, By Martin Gilman Wolcott and getting the message of the e-books, then locating the various other next book to read. It continues increasingly more. The moment to finish reviewing a book The Evil 100, By Martin Gilman Wolcott will be consistently numerous relying on spar time to spend; one example is this The Evil 100, By Martin Gilman Wolcott
Now, just how do you recognize where to buy this book The Evil 100, By Martin Gilman Wolcott Don't bother, now you may not visit the publication shop under the bright sunlight or night to browse guide The Evil 100, By Martin Gilman Wolcott We right here constantly help you to find hundreds type of publication. One of them is this e-book entitled The Evil 100, By Martin Gilman Wolcott You could visit the web link page given in this collection and after that go for downloading and install. It will certainly not take even more times. Simply link to your website access as well as you could access guide The Evil 100, By Martin Gilman Wolcott on-line. Obviously, after downloading and install The Evil 100, By Martin Gilman Wolcott, you may not publish it.
You can conserve the soft data of this publication The Evil 100, By Martin Gilman Wolcott It will depend upon your extra time and tasks to open up and review this book The Evil 100, By Martin Gilman Wolcott soft file. So, you may not be afraid to bring this book The Evil 100, By Martin Gilman Wolcott anywhere you go. Just add this sot documents to your kitchen appliance or computer disk to allow you check out every single time and also almost everywhere you have time.
- Also included is a bonus listing on serial killers
- Sales Rank: #4010969 in Books
- Brand: Brand: Citadel
- Published on: 2002-06
- Released on: 2002-06-01
- Original language: English
- Number of items: 1
- Dimensions: 10.28" h x 1.08" w x 7.52" l,
- Binding: Hardcover
- 348 pages
- Used Book in Good Condition
Most helpful customer reviews
9 of 10 people found the following review helpful.
Good, at times lurid, but not comprehensive
By Steven F. Olivo
The editors of this book have put together a list of 100 undoubtedly evil people (mostly men, but including poisoner Catherine de Medici and real-life vampiress Elizabeth Bathory as well as one or two other women)distilled down to 2-3-page summaries covering their lives, their actions, and usually a little bit about their motivations, though frequently these are facile one-sentence comments such as "infidels cannot be allowed to live." Most notable are the frequently lurid descriptions of the actions of these people, some of which, such as the uncensored reprinting of mocking (and graphic)letters murderer Albert Fish wrote to the parents of two children he had killed, cooked, and eaten, are not for the easily sickened. Though body count and continuing influence are important factors, the editors also use a somewhat nebulous "glee factor" and the depravity of a subject's action when determining rank.
The usual suspects among this world's tyrants and democides top the list (Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, and so on, as well as terrorist bin Laden and a group listing for the tyrannical Taliban), but after about 30 it quickly shifts to a list of mass murderers, including the well-known (Dahmer, Bundy, Manson, Gacy, Berkowitz), the not-as-well-known (satanist Richard Ramirez, white-hater Mark Essex), and the unknown (The Boston Strangler, Jack the Ripper). Places on the list also go to Columbine shooters Harris and Klebold and a general listing for computer virus writers.
Some villains of the medieval period rank surprisingly highly, Genghis Khan, Attila, and Ivan the Terrible all appear among the top 10. Though Khan, who conquered most of Asia in a very brutal manner, probably deserves to be there, and perhaps Ivan, who set a pattern for repressive government in Russia also does, but Attila, brutal as he was, was largely unrealized possibility, for after his defeat at Chalons the odds of his dominating Europe vanished if ever they were there, and I question the high ranking of such an ephemeral person. Likewise highly rated is Basil the Bulgar-slayer, who blinded 14,000 captured prisoners, but was no more a tyrant than most to sit on the throne in Constantinople. One crime, it appears, can sometimes vault one very high on the list, though it may not have tremendous influence. Enver Pasha and Talat Pasha, who engineered the genocide of the Armenians in the Turkish Empire, share a high spot on the list, certainly merited, although none of the sultans appear.
That leads to the question of whether the editors of this book cast their nets wide enough, and turned too quickly to lurid and perhaps topical 20th century murderers to fill out the list. Though no one can deny what the Columbine shooters did was both insane and evil, they were essentially bullied kids who hit back much too hard. No one can also deny that virus writers cause many problems, but almost never death. Yet both are mentioned. Castro, however, is not, nor are Nicolae Ceacescu, Enver Hoxha, nor almost any of the other Cold War dictators, many of whom were even worse to their own people than any Communist ruler save Hitler and Mao. Chile's Pinochet makes the list, but not his counterpart in Argentina Juan Peron, of the days of helicopters departing full over the seas and returning empty and other "disappearances." Saddam Hussein makes the list, but not his opponent Ayatollah Khomeini, who sent Iranian teenagers in human-wave attacks against Iraqi tanks and bombers. Mithridates of Pontus, who murdered 100,000 Romans, and Francisco Lopez, who led the nation of Paraguay into a triple-front war in the 1800s that reduced his own population from 1,400,000 to 229,000 and killed 1,000,000 Argentinians, Brazilians, and Uruguayans, all in the name of megalomania, get no mention at all. Likewise, terrorists Yasser Arafat, Jomo Kenyatta, who led the vicious Mau Mau movement in Kenya, and Roger Casement, father of the IRA, get no mention at all.
In sum, although the book paints a very good picture of 100 evil people, it is by no means complete or comprehensive.
9 of 13 people found the following review helpful.
The banality of writing a cheap book about evil
By pnotley@hotmail.com
There are many things wrong with this book as a list, and as a discussion of the problem of evil. But consider just one thing. This is a collection of malefactors that Islamic fanatics would approve of. Of course Osama Bin Laden makes number 8, and so do the Taliban and Saddam Hussein. But that's to be expected from Americans. But how could they not admire a book in which 46 of the world's most evil people come from the United States? When you add people from Britain, Australia and Canada you get a solid majority from the Anglo-American world. And so many of their crimes involve sexual perversity and anonymous murder, which clearly trumps religious bigotry and systematic injustice in the author's scale of evils. Basically this is a book that starts off with the most infamous tyrants (Hitler is number one), and after the first twenty and thirty places, goes on to discuss mass murderers and serial killers. The four Presidential assassins are included, and the book rounds out with the Marquis De Sade and virus writers. Aside from inadvertently giving aid to comfort to America's enemies by suggesting it has, if not a monopoly of evil, controlling interest in it, the book is superficial and unpleasant to read. The book combines a shallow moralism with a lurid interest in their subject's atrocities, a sort of pornography for Republicans. The moral questions are not really addressed. For a start many of the book's subjects are patently insane, even by the strict and pro-Prosecutor guidelines of Anglo-American law. Is it useful to describe as evil someone who does not have the capacity for moral choice, or which is constrained by severe psychological problems? Sure, says the author. It doesn't matter that Martin Bryant, the Tasmanian mass murderer had an IQ of 66 or that Caligula may have been suffering from schizophrenia or epilepsy.
Reading the earlier entries one wondered how many of the charges against Genghis Khan, Attila the Hun, Ivan IV (the Terrible) or Vlad III (the Impaler, who makes the top 10) are actually true or are just propaganda. Good question, since Vlad III's status rests more on the idea that he was the inspiration for Dracula. The suspicion increases when the entry on Hussein starts by blaming him for the anthrax mailings in the fall of 2001, something which he clearly was not responsible for. The historical analysis is not very deep. Salvador Allende was not a Communist. There is no good reason for having Eichmann appear before Himmler, his superior, nor did he have to face 15 charges at Nuremberg. The book overstates the severity and intensity of the persecution of Christians as a result of Nero, while at the time ignoring his destruction of Jerusalem. Likewise Tojo's treatment of American POWs gets more condemnation than the way the treated the rest of Asia. Mussolini's worst acts, his African atrocities, get little space. And there is much that is missing. Neither Khomenei or the Shah appear; the African slave trade is completely ignored, and so is apartheid. Idi Amin Dada appears, but the perpetrators of the Rwandan genocide are missed. The Belgian Rulers who may have caused the deaths of 15 million Congolese in their occupation of the country are forgotten. The whole bloody subjugation of the Western hemisphere goes unmentioned, so there is nothing on how Pizarro managed to destroy and enslave an entire civilization out of sheer greed. The Thirty Years War, the Crusades, the conquest of Ireland, the suppression of the Dutch Revolt are all ignored. If Stalin's and Mao's famines are to be condemned what about the Irish potato famine or the (several) Bengal famines? Mobuto, Suharto, D'Aubisson, Stroessener and the rulers of Guatemala get no mention. Nor, needless to say, do Hiroshima and Nagasaki. If Garfield's assasin deserves an entry, shouldn't Gandhi's? (Or for that matter the assassins of Indira or Rajiv Gandhi?) Charles Guiteau was just a disgruntled office seeker and Garfield a mediocre politician. The assassins of Gandhi, Luxembourg, Jaures, Rabin, King, Barthou, Bloch, Milk and Moscone were fascists or something close to it. And what about the judicial murder of Thomas More or Margaret Pole? McKinley's conquest of the Philippines involved many atrocities and the death of one in seven Filipinos. Shouldn't he rank higher than his killer?
2 of 9 people found the following review helpful.
biased
By Jefferson Davis
After reading the first half-dozen entries and skimming the rest, the summaries are not as concise as they could be and some entries are questionable. The most obvious one:
John Wilkes Booth makes the list of most evil (number 94), but Linconln should be there instead. Lincoln is primarily responsible for the deaths of 620,000 people because he could have simply allowed the Confederate states to have their independence. Instead, he launched a military invasion, allowed the demolition of cities which caused starvation and disease. He imprisoned thousands of people simply because they were sympathetic to the Confederacy, leaving them jailed indefinitely, without access to attorneys or a listing of charges against them. He shut down many newspapers and confisticated telegraph companies. He refused to meet with Confederate delegations during the war, which could have resulted in a compromise. The South was justified in seeking relief from the unfair tax burden and their decreasing representation in the senate and house. The constitution and other laws effectively permitted secession. Lincoln was not really anti-slavery and slavery was dying out throughout the Americas anyway (it ended in Brazil, in 1888).
Also, referring to the Civil War battle of Antietam, 22,000 was not the number killed. It was the number of casualties (dead, wounded and missing).
The Evil 100, by Martin Gilman Wolcott PDF
The Evil 100, by Martin Gilman Wolcott EPub
The Evil 100, by Martin Gilman Wolcott Doc
The Evil 100, by Martin Gilman Wolcott iBooks
The Evil 100, by Martin Gilman Wolcott rtf
The Evil 100, by Martin Gilman Wolcott Mobipocket
The Evil 100, by Martin Gilman Wolcott Kindle
No comments:
Post a Comment